For individuals who have adopted Tesla for lengthy, or have adopted virtually any notable tales relating to the Tesla board of administrators, you might be for certain aware of claims that the Tesla board and Elon Musk are far too shut and that there’s not sufficient independence on the board. It’s generally claimed that the board simply does no matter Elon Musk desires. Now, US Senator Elizabeth Warren is pushing for stronger motion on this matter.

Senator Warren has despatched a letter to the Securities and Alternate Fee (SEC) asking that the SEC examine the board, indicating concern about “conflicts of curiosity, misappropriation of company belongings, and different adverse impacts to Tesla shareholders” particularly associated to Elon Musk’s Twitter acquisition and actions within the months that adopted.

It’s a 9-page letter, so I gained’t quote all of it right here. However I’ll pull out a couple of quotes:

“The Board’s inaction and insufficient disclosures, and the shut relationships of a number of Board members to Mr. Musk, increase questions concerning the effectiveness of their company governance and potential violations of securities legal guidelines.”

“Regardless of hiring Ms. Yaccarino [as CEO of Twitter], he’s more likely to retain ‘important management’ over the corporate and intends to proceed overseeing core capabilities of the enterprise. Given the considerations concerning the actions by Mr. Musk and the Board, I ask that the SEC conduct a assessment to find out if they’ve complied with related securities legal guidelines.”

“In December 2022, in a letter to Tesla’s Chair of the Board of Administrators, Dr. Robyn Denholm, I expressed my considerations concerning the company governance points raised by the construction of Mr. Musk’s deal to purchase Twitter and his actions after turning into CEO, together with:

• • The doable misappropriation of Tesla sources by Mr. Musk’s funneling of ‘greater than 50 of his trusted Tesla staff’ to work on his Twitter takeover, together with Tesla’s Chief Data Officer and different senior employees. This use of Tesla staff raised apparent questions on whether or not Mr. Musk appropriated sources from a publicly traded agency, Tesla, to learn his personal personal firm, Twitter. This might probably violate Mr. Musk’s authorized responsibility of loyalty to Tesla and set off questions concerning the Board’s accountability to forestall such actions, and may additionally run afoul different ‘antitunneling’ guidelines that goal to forestall company insiders from extracting sources from their companies.
  • Inevitable conflicts of curiosity arising from, for instance, Twitter’s reliance on promoting income from vehicle corporations which can be in direct competitors with Tesla, together with Audi, Chevrolet, Ford, GM, Jeep, and Volkswagen. Because the proprietor of Twitter, Mr. Musk may determine to run the corporate to maximise badly-needed income, even when that features nice offers for Tesla’s rivals and potential harm to Tesla. Alternatively, Mr. Musk may run Twitter to learn Tesla by means of favorable algorithms or free promoting. These considerations have solely grown since Tesla just lately introduced its intention to start promoting, selecting to launch its first ever advert by means of Twitter.”

“Considerations about Mr. Musk’s actions as Tesla CEO have solely elevated in current months. In April 2023, a gaggle of 17 main Tesla traders wrote an open letter to Tesla’s Board expressing concern ‘that the Board of Administrators is failing to adequately symbolize the pursuits of Tesla’s shareholders.’ The letter notes that Mr. Musk ‘seems to be distracted or overly targeted on different ventures’ and the Board’s ‘meager oversight’ over his habits is ‘jeopardizing [Tesla’s] long-term worth.’ Furthermore, the letter notes the reported ‘shut private relationships’ between Mr. Musk and a number of other members of Tesla’s Board, in addition to Board members’ ‘exceptionally excessive compensation,’ expressing concern concerning the Board’s ‘objectivity, independence, and talent to prioritize the wants of Tesla and its shareholders.’”

If you wish to learn extra, you may take a look at the entire letter. The general level, although, is {that a} US Senator is pushing for the SEC to look into the connection between Elon Musk and the Tesla board, particularly because it considerations Elon Musk’s working of Twitter. We’ll see what comes of it.

I do not like paywalls. You do not like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Right here at CleanTechnica, we applied a restricted paywall for some time, however it all the time felt fallacious — and it was all the time powerful to determine what we should always put behind there. In principle, your most unique and finest content material goes behind a paywall. However then fewer individuals learn it! We simply do not like paywalls, and so we have determined to ditch ours.

Sadly, the media enterprise remains to be a troublesome, cut-throat enterprise with tiny margins. It is a unending Olympic problem to remain above water and even maybe — gasp — develop. So …