[ad_1]
From the July 1994 concern of Automotive and Driver.
If we will imagine our handsomely paid demographics consultants, then most of you studying this had been youngsters someday between the mid-Nineteen Fifties and the early Seventies. And if our chance and statistics calculations are right, then a relatively massive quantity of you spent a few of your childhood relegated to the again seat of a station wagon. You would possibly even have discovered to drive within the Household Truckster, maybe adorning it with a battle scar or two within the course of.
Promoting of that bygone period glamorized the station wagon as the important thing to a lifetime of blissful leisure for the All-American household. Ozzie clones lined as much as purchase wagons regardless of their excessive sticker costs (the wagon was typically the priciest mannequin in a collection, even costing greater than the convertible). A wagon was the right automobile for hauling paneling or shrubbery again to the suburban homestead or for tenting, fishing, and cross-country holidays.
As these pursuits grew in recognition through the decade after WWII, wagon gross sales exploded, from 1 p.c of the market in 1946 to a peak of 17 p.c and practically one million models in 1959. By the late Sixties, burgeoning gross sales of sunshine vans and massive vans dropped the wagon’s market share to under 10 p.c. The hefty gasoline worth hikes of the Seventies dealt full-sized station wagons one other blow. And the beginning of the minivan halved the wagon’s share once more.
At present, minivans have a lock on 8 p.c of the full automobile market, hauling youngsters, plywood, and stuff that households used to hold in station wagons. In some ways, the minivan is healthier suited to those duties. Tall, upright packaging permits an equal or better variety of folks and issues to suit right into a smaller and lighter automobile. Mother and father can commute between the entrance and rear seats to settle the occasional border skirmish or wipe an ice-cream-stained face. And minivans present excellent visibility over visitors.
Minivan producers like to speak about how “carlike” their autos journey and deal with. However when it comes proper all the way down to it, minivans really feel about as very similar to automobiles as tempeh tastes like hamburger or Sharp’s tastes like beer. Station wagons really feel extra like automobiles as a result of they’re automobiles, plain and easy.
Having examined the minivan discipline a number of occasions since our final station wagon comparability, we had been desirous to expertise the journey and dealing with advantages of wagons and to weigh them in opposition to area and luxury concessions. And people of us who grew up crisscrossing the nation on station-wagon holidays had been curious to learn the way the present crop of wagons evaluate with our fond recollections, and whether or not these glamorizing advert slogans would possibly nonetheless apply.
We chosen six well-equipped and fairly fashionable or sporting wagons priced within the low-to-mid-$20,000s. Then we loaded them with tenting, climbing, and boating paraphernalia for a working trip within the Hocking Hills area of southern Ohio. Here is how they fared.
sixth Place: Mitsubishi Diamante
The Diamante entered this competition with a critical worth handicap. Its double-take base worth of $26,790 is nicely above all the opposite automobiles’ as-tested costs. The distinction will be traced to the Diamante’s Australian pedigree, to not an abundance of normal tools. Our automobile stickered at practically $30,000 with leather-based upholstery, so we instructed editors to miss the leather-based and assess it as if it had been the $27,662 fabric automobile. It nonetheless ranked final in worth.
HIGHS: Lovely and {smooth}, inside and outside.
LOWS: Excessive worth, low energy, legs of Jell-O.
VERDICT: The turnpike cruiser of the bunch.
In journey and dealing with, the Mitsubishi maybe most carefully approximates our recollection of the outdated household wagon. An unsophisticated rigid-axle rear suspension and mushy damping lead to the very best boulevard journey however essentially the most flaccid dealing with. Oodles of bushing compliance and overboosted steering help give the Diamante a squirmy, non-linear turn-in that results in massive understeer.
At 3704 kilos, the Diamante can also be the heaviest wagon right here, and its syrupy {smooth} 175-horse V-6 struggles to offer modest efficiency. The Diamante completed final in practically each acceleration take a look at, and we worry that when burdened with household and equipment, its restricted passing energy would imprison this wagon behind Winnebagos and semis on twisty, hilly two-lane highways.
On the upside, the Diamante appears stunning inside and outside. It presents the richest inside, good ergonomics, and comfy seats entrance and rear. Rear-seat occupants get a large middle armrelaxation, an adjustable backrest, and browseing lamps—all of which ought to hold the whining and combating to a minimal.
The field in again of this wagon earns excessive marks for its broad, low load flooring and 48-inch-wide hatch opening. With simply 45 inches between the wheel wells, sheets of plywood and paneling will relaxation on a slight angle, however they are going to slide into the Diamante higher than into any of the opposite wagons.
1994 Mitsubishi Diamante
175-hp V-6, 4-speed computerized, 3704 lb
Base/as-tested worth: $26,790/$27,662
Passenger quantity, behind F/R: 54/44 ft3
Cargo quantity, seats up/folded: 37/72 ft3
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 10.6 sec
1/4-mile: 17.9 sec @ 80 mph
100 mph: 31.1 sec
Braking, 70–0 mph: 193 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.72 g
C/D noticed gasoline financial system: 18 mpg
fifth Place: Mercury Sable LS
Ford was the number-one vendor of wagons for years, and the Taurus and Sable lead the market as we speak by a large margin. It ought to subsequently come as no shock that this Sable handles wagoning duties the very best. It carries the most individuals (eight), and it has essentially the most area inside. Considerate touches abound, like a rear window that may be opened with out opening the hatch and a internet to maintain parcels contained behind the wagon.
HIGHS: House for eight folks or 83 cubic toes of stuff.
LOWS: Uninteresting chassis dynamics, uncomfortable seats.
VERDICT: Counters the Windstar as essentially the most minivan-like automobile.
We strongly suggest the $150 non-compulsory rear-facing third seat, even for those who by no means plan on sentencing anybody to take a seat again there (padding is sort of nil; ditto for head, leg, and hip room). The great thing about this feature is that it strikes the spare tire out from beneath the deck and places it in an in any other case ineffective area on the aspect of the cargo space. This leaves a number of area within the nicely beneath the tiny third-seat cushions for stowing gear. It additionally makes the spare simpler to get at when the cargo bay is loaded. The Sable’s baggage rack wins massive factors with its tie-down hooks and accessory-mounting factors.
The Sable imitates a minivan fairly nicely. Sadly, its impression of a spry sedan is not as convincing. From the second the motive force climbs in, a excessive cowl, smallish home windows, and flat unsupportive bench seats appear to whisper the message, “Straightforward within the turns fella’, yer drivin’ a giant automobile.” If unheeded, the sentiment is reemphasised by squealing from the tires. From the logbook: “Steering is mushy and turn-in sluggish,” and “Heaps o’ tire squeal. Even the platform appears to groan once you load it exhausting in corners—good journey although.”
With the loosest grip on the skidpad, the longest braking distance from 70 mph, and a considerably groany V-6 engine that managed solely midpack numbers, the Sable ranked second to final within the fun-to-drive and dealing with classes. Its last-place scores in driver and rear-seat consolation helped seal its fifth-place end.
1994 Mercury Sable LS
140-hp V-6, 4-speed computerized, 3489 lb
Base/as-tested worth: $21,645/$22,835
Passenger quantity, behind F/R/third: 53/47/28 ft3
Cargo quantity, seats up/folded: 38/83 ft3
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 9.6 sec
1/4-mile: 17.3 sec @ 78 mph
100 mph: 33.1 sec
Braking, 70–0 mph: 197 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.71 g
C/D noticed gasoline financial system: 20 mpg
4th Place: Subaru Legacy Touring
Take all the things we have mentioned in regards to the Diamante and Sable and reverse it 180 levels and also you nearly have our tackle the Subaru. This featherweight flyer carves up twisty roads much more eagerly than every other wagon within the bunch. Its 4 pushed tires cling to the highway tenaciously, the fronts passing each byte of floor data proper from the contact patches to the motive force via a wonderfully weighted steering system.
HIGHS: Brass and spunky drivetrain, fly-paper traction and dealing with.
LOWS: Flexy physique, buzzy engine, fade-prone brakes.
VERDICT: One of the best wagon for carving up a mountain highway—if the household can grasp on.
A turbocharged and intercooled flat-four and a close-ratio four-speed computerized add to the enjoyable in low-speed point-and-squirt operating. The turbo spools up shortly via brief final-drive gearing to offer terrific thrust. The Legacy bolts away from the pack as much as about 60 mph. As velocity builds, this little motor begins to pant fairly exhausting, nonetheless, and simply previous the quarter-mile, the Camry and Passat energy previous it. And that efficiency has its prices—the Legacy managed solely 18 mpg over our 700-mile journey.
A couple of testers commented on the spongy really feel of the Legacy’s brake pedal, however by and enormous, the entries had been glowing. “That is the Eagle Talon TSi of the bunch,” raved one. “I want the compact really feel of this smaller wagon on winding roads,” mentioned one other.
Alas, as a wagon, the Legacy comes up considerably brief. Again-seat consolation suffers from an absence of head and shoulder room. The cargo space, whereas comparatively massive, just isn’t as helpful as some others. The rear seats do not fold flat, there are not any tie-down hooks, and there is not a lot hid space for storing. The small baggage rack lacks mounting {hardware} for aftermarket rack equipment.
The Legacy Touring wagon comes very nicely geared up, with a glass sunroof, a CD participant, and energy eachfactor. But it surely looks like a much less substantial automobile than its competitors, as a consequence of plentiful physique flex and a relatively cheap-sounding engine. And although it has a driver’s airbag, the Legacy nonetheless has motorized seatbelts—an absolute no-buy for many people.
A number of of our complaints will doubtless be resolved within the new-for-’95 Legacy due later this yr. Within the meantime, regardless of its eagerness to play, the Legacy’s aversion to work restricted it to fourth place.
1994 Subaru Legacy Touring
160-hp flat-4, 4-speed computerized, 3240 lb
Base/as-tested worth: $23,645/$23,778
Passenger quantity, behind F/R: 50/40 ft3
Cargo quantity, seats up/folded: 36/71 ft3
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 8.2 sec
1/4-mile: 16.4 sec @ 82 mph
100 mph: 27.6 sec
Braking, 70–0 mph: 185 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.78 g
C/D noticed gasoline financial system: 18 mpg
third Place: Honda Accord EX
The Accord wagon was unanimously awarded the distinction of “most sedan-like wagon,” thanks largely to a cargo field that provides solely 90 kilos and preserves the excellent dealing with dynamics of Honda’s subtle control-arm and multilink suspension. Sadly, cargo area is equally sedan-like. The wagon’s brief rear overhang and classy however steeply raked again window give it between 8 and 15 fewer cubic toes of cargo area behind the rear seat than any of the gathered opponents have.
HIGHS: Excellent driving place, slick and exact mechanicals.
LOWS: Lacks energy, cargo area, and joie de vivre.
VERDICT: Probably the most sedan-like wagon.
Our Accord was the one wagon on this practice with out some sort of bags rack. Honda presents a dealer-installed unit comparable in type and performance to the Sable’s rack, priced at $499. Additionally accessible are an enclosed baggage basket, a motorcycle rack, and a ski rack; all will be mounted on the luggage rack. We strongly suggest the rack and basket for anybody considering a cross-country jaunt with a household of 4. What the Accord’s inside lacks in amount, it makes up for in typical Honda high quality. Drivers of all sizes praised the excellent seating place, management relationships, and visibility out of the cockpit. “All of the buttons and knobs are properly positioned and simple to achieve and perceive,” one in all us famous.
Up within the Hocking Hills, the Accord by no means threatened to wag its wagon tail, even on the limits of adhesion. However these limits are comparatively modest, as famous by a local Ohioan editor: “Nice steering on the twisty stuff, very composed at 9-tenths, however might use extra aggressive tires.”
The Accord might additionally use some aggression remedy within the engine room, as its smooth-running 2.2-liter VTEC 4-cylinder was the smallest and least torquey motor of the bunch. A 3186-pound curb weight and brief gearing stored the Honda operating with the pack from 0 to 60. In any other case, the Accord goes about its business with a mild-mannered meekness which will assist it inherit the earth however earned it solely a third-place end.
1994 Honda Accord EX
145-hp inline-4, 4-speed computerized, 3186 lb
Base/as-tested worth: $21,850/$21,937
Passenger quantity, behind F/R: 53/39 ft3
Cargo quantity, seats up/folded: 26/68 ft3
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 9.6 sec
1/4-mile: 17.4 sec @ 80 mph
100 mph: 34.8 sec
Braking, 70–0 mph: 188 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.74 g
C/D noticed gasoline financial system: 22 mpg
2nd Place: Toyota Camry LE
Bear in mind the smarmy goody-two-shoes child in school that at all times did all the things proper? On this class, the Camry is that child.
It’s going to carry nearly something the Sable can, together with a few ankle-biters going through againward within the again. The Camry’s non-compulsory $315 rear-facing third seat presents barely much less head and leg room than the Sable’s, however the underdeck storage nonetheless justifies the choice. Passengers within the Camry’s third seat get shoulder belts and an inside latch (with a child-protection lock) to allow them toselves out. Toyota gives the longest and best-equipped baggage rack for bolting or lashing on skis, boats, and equipment.
HIGHS: Finest engine, finest passenger area, finest construct high quality.
LOWS: No-thanks styling, remoted and unengaging as a driver’s automobile.
VERDICT: In purely quantitative phrases, this one would win.
Even on the monitor, the Camry is a Dudley Doright. With essentially the most powerful engine of the group, it turned in the very best quarter-mile (16.4 seconds at 85 mph), the very best prime velocity (126 mph), the very best braking from 70 mph (174 toes), and it tied for the very best skidpad grip (0.78 g). However maybe due to the smug, silent, and remoted method the Camry generates these numbers, the motive force would not appear to get pleasure from producing them right here as a lot as in another automobiles.
Out on the highway, most editors agreed with this remark: “This automobile feels pretty much as good pushed to excessive limits because it does within the 7-Eleven lot—stylish.” However additionally they agreed with the commentary that “the homely styling and inside trim and the uninteresting steering take away most of what you could possibly name sportiness—I want the VW within the hills.”
And so it went with the voting. The valedictorian did not win the recognition contest. The Camry excels in any respect the precise-brain actions, nevertheless it form of lets the left mind atrophy.
1994 Toyota Camry LE
188-hp V-6, 4-speed computerized, 3505 lb
Base/as-tested worth: $23,303/$25,398
Passenger quantity, behind F/R/third: 56/44/23 ft3
Cargo quantity, seats up/folded: 41/75 ft3
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 8.3 sec
1/4-mile: 16.4 sec @ 85 mph
100 mph: 24.2 sec
Braking, 70–0 mph: 174 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.78 g
C/D noticed gasoline financial system: 21 mpg
1st Place: Volkswagen Passat GLX
Typically the entire is price greater than the sum of the elements, and that is the key of this Passat. Merely put, this one pushed all our buttons. VW revised this yr’s Passat considerably and stuck our greatest gripe by becoming airbags and adjustable shoulder belts with automatic pretensioning rather than the long-dreaded motor-mouse belts. The motive force’s bag lives in a lovely new four-spoke steering wheel. The passenger bag occupies what was the glove compartment, leaving little space for storing up entrance.
The Passat’s taut European suspension traverses North American potholes and growth joints extra comfortably this yr, due to new Goodyear Eagle GA tires. And new structural adhesives have beefed up physique inflexibleity by 15 p.c and decreased highway noise considerably.
HIGHS: Ardent chassis, exceptional area effectivity, excellent cockpit.
LOWS: Ineffective baggage rack, substantial worth.
VERDICT: The wagon that finest appeals to all of the senses.
Lastly, the controversial sq. pug nostril of outdated has been freshened with a brand new grille and wraparound headlamps that current form of a smug grin to the wind.
Related grins appeared on the faces of the editors after a short while behind that new airbag wheel. The Passat’s 172-horse VR6 doesn’t generate class-leading numbers, nevertheless it makes stylish noises and retains this tight nimble wagon forward of the pack within the minimize and thrust.
With 0.78 g of grip and wonderful roll management, the Passat was the quickest and smoothest automobile via each the measured lane-change maneuver and the Ohio chicanes. “Would not really feel cumbersome. Nice steering response and loads of passing energy,” mentioned one tester. “Transmission snaps off downshifts like salutes,” famous one other.
Headroom and legroom abound each entrance and rear, and the seats are agency, well-shaped, and supportive. As within the Diamante, the rear seatbacks are adjustable. The Passat’s cargo bay is sq. and helpful in form, however simply average in measurement. Its “baggage rack” is only for present—accent crossbars and luggage baskets are required to hold anyfactor exterior, and the rails create wind noise proper subsequent to the sunroof.
Ultimately, our proper brains had been satisfied with the Passat in exhausting, chilly, goal phrases, and our left brains had been smitten with its character and privateity. Therefore, it wins by a nostril.
1994 Volkswagen Passat GLX
172-hp V-6, 4-speed computerized, 3266 lb
Base/as-tested worth: $23,890/$24,765
Passenger quantity, behind F/R: 54/43 ft3
Cargo quantity, seats up/folded: 34/69 ft3
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 9.5 sec
1/4-mile: 17.2 sec @ 83 mph
100 mph: 27.0 sec
Braking, 70–0 mph: 178 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.78 g
C/D noticed gasoline financial system: 20 mpg
Conclusions? Except your babyhood wagon reminiscences are of a Chevy II, a Plymouth Valiant, or a Rambler American, these wagons are going to look small. On a visit, a household of 5 or extra should pack mild, and three folks sitting throughout any of those again seats will want they had been in a minivan.
Meals and equipment for 4 folks on a month-long cross-country journey match simply behind the Markus household wagon (a ’69 Chevy Townsman) with nothing on the roof and room for an individual to sleep within the cargo space. At present that form of journey undoubtedly requires a mini (or maxi) van.
However many households of 4 would by no means dream of taking such prolonged holidays. They needn’t view the minivan as a basic component of the household plan. Any of those six wagons, when geared up with a good baggage rack, will carry a household of 4 to Disney and tote shrubs and lumber with aplomb.
For those who want the area and carrying capability, by all means have a look at a minivan. However for those who treasure driving pleacertain, you must undoubtedly see if one in all these reasonably sized wagons can meet your wants. Your left mind will certainly respect it.
[ad_2]