Home Automotive Chery Omoda E5 v MG ZS EV v BYD Atto 3 Malaysian comparability – battle of the inexpensive electrical SUV

Chery Omoda E5 v MG ZS EV v BYD Atto 3 Malaysian comparability – battle of the inexpensive electrical SUV

Chery Omoda E5 v MG ZS EV v BYD Atto 3 Malaysian comparability – battle of the inexpensive electrical SUV


Chery Omoda E5 v MG ZS EV v BYD Atto 3 Malaysian comparison – battle of the affordable electric SUV

There’s been a slew of electrical car previews and launches over the previous few months, and the newest is the arrival of the Chery Omoda E5. Launched final week, the zero-emission model of the favored Omoda 5 is taking part in within the decrease reaches of the electrical SUV market, and there’s no prizes for guessing its largest rival.

Certainly, the Omoda E5 is gunning straight for the BYD Atto 3, coming with a lovely value and a few spectacular specs. However Chery and BYD aren’t alone on this section, as MG can also be throwing its hat within the ring with the forthcoming ZS EV. Three value-driven EVs, every with its personal strengths and weak point – learn on to see how these automobiles stack up.

Value – ZS EV will likely be cheaper, Omoda E5 supplies larger worth

Chery Omoda E5 v MG ZS EV v BYD Atto 3 Malaysian comparison – battle of the affordable electric SUV

There’s a really particular order to the pricing of those automobiles, and the title of most cost-effective electrical SUV in Malaysia must go to the ZS EV. It hasn’t been launched but, however MG’s estimated pricing of RM129,000 places it in a novel place, though – as you’ll discover out quickly sufficient – the low, low value does include a justifiable share of tradeoffs.

But when it’s worth for cash you’re searching for, then the Omoda E5 has slightly stolen the march from the Atto 3. Retailing at RM146,800, the Chery is a number of thousand ringgit cheaper than the BYD in Commonplace Vary type (RM149,800) – and that’s earlier than you realise its specs are nearer to the Atto 3 Prolonged Vary (RM167,800). That’s an enormous distinction, whichever means you slice it.

Thoughts you, BYD has since responded by providing a huge RM20,000 rebate for 2023 mannequin yr Atto 3s, now ranging from simply RM129,800. That very same rebate would put the Prolonged Vary mannequin proper throughout the Omoda E5’s ballpark. Listed below are the costs of all 4 obtainable fashions, sorted by value (all on-the-road with out insurance coverage):

  • MG ZS EV – RM129,000 (estimated)
  • Chery Omoda E5 – RM146,800
  • BYD Atto 3 Commonplace Vary – RM149,800
  • BYD Atto 3 Prolonged Vary – RM167,800
Dimensions – ZS EV smallest, Atto 3 most sensible, with devoted EV platform

Chery Omoda E5 v MG ZS EV v BYD Atto 3 Malaysian comparison – battle of the affordable electric SUV

Being in a special value bracket, it’s no shock that the ZS EV can also be smaller than the opposite two right here, being labeled as a B-segment slightly than a C-segment SUV. Towards the measuring tape, the MG is round 100 mm shorter and its wheelbase can also be comfortably the smallest of the three. And sure, it makes use of torsion beam rear suspension as an alternative of the multi-links employed by the Chery and BYD.

The extra compact dimensions will possible lead to a smaller cabin, particularly on the again the place the Atto 3 is especially spacious due to having by far the longest wheelbase of all of them. That’s the results of it being constructed on a bespoke EV platform, whereas the others have been designed to suit petrol engines too.

However the ZS EV doesn’t have the smallest boot – in truth, it has the biggest right here, at 470 litres. The Atto 3 is subsequent with a 440-litre boot, however the picket spoon goes to the Omoda E5, the boot of which measures a scant 378 litres. It makes up for that by being the one one with a entrance boot.

Efficiency and vary – Omoda 5 is the no-brainer

Chery Omoda E5 v MG ZS EV v BYD Atto 3 Malaysian comparison – battle of the affordable electric SUV

The Omoda E5’s true worth proposition reveals itself if you take a look at the specs, the place you’ll discover placing similarities with the Atto 3 Prolonged Vary. It makes the identical quantity of energy and barely extra torque, and it additionally has a similarly-sized 61 kWh lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery – additionally made by BYD, so one would assume it’s the identical pack – because the Atto 3 ER variant. The Chery manages to eke out marginally extra vary (430 km versus 420 km on the WLTP cycle).

Subsequent to the Chery, the MG’s specs look decidedly subpar. It has decrease outputs and will get from zero to 100 km/h a trite slower because of this, however its Achilles’ heel has bought to be its comparatively small 51.1 kWh battery. And though it’s barely bigger than the one within the Atto 3 Commonplace Vary, the automotive is clearly much less environment friendly, as its vary is a full 25 km shorter – a meagre 320 km.

One quirk of those three automobiles is that all of them include an LFP battery, as an alternative of the extra frequent nickel manganese cobalt (NMC) models. This could imply they’re safer, will last more and help the next quantity of cost cycles, that means you’ll have the ability to cost them extra regularly earlier than they degrade. Talking of charging…

Charging – Omoda 5 takes the cake, ZS EV brings up the rear

Chery Omoda E5 v MG ZS EV v BYD Atto 3 Malaysian comparison – battle of the affordable electric SUV

Electrical automobiles on the decrease finish of the value spectrum sometimes can’t help very quick charging speeds, and these automobiles aren’t any exception. The quickest charging, the Omoda E5 and Atto 3 Prolonged Vary, max out at 80 kW for DC energy, so even these ones take fairly some time to high up their batteries – 45 minutes from zero to 80% within the case of the BYD.

The Atto 3 Commonplace Vary’s DC quick charging capability is barely decrease at 70 kWh, however its smaller battery ought to cancel out that drawback. Probably the most disappointing of the lot is the ZS EV, which may muster solely 50 kW, so even charging its small battery from 10 to 80% takes a sluggish 54 minutes. That will likely be significantly pricey at chargers that cost you by time spent.

All of those automobiles help simply 7 kW single-phase AC charging, with the notable exception of the Omoda E5. It has a 9.9 kW three-phase onboard charger, so you’re going to get the utmost charging pace obtainable, it doesn’t matter what kind of wallbox you personal.

Sadly, Chery doesn’t quote the AC charging time, however we will anticipate it to be barely faster than the Atto 3 Prolonged Vary, which takes 9 hours and 42 minutes for a full cost. As we’ve talked about earlier than, the draw back of an EV with a 7 kW OBC is that the charging pace is halved to three.5 kW should you use an 11 kW three-phase charger; you’ll want a 7 kW single-phase or 22 kW three-phase charger to get the complete quantity.

Guarantee and upkeep – ZS EV supplies longest protection

Chery Omoda E5 v MG ZS EV v BYD Atto 3 Malaysian comparison – battle of the affordable electric SUV

Chery, MG and BYD all present the longest guarantee protection in Malaysia, however the Omoda E5 and ZS EV provide a slight benefit on this regard, with a seven-year/150,000 km car guarantee. The Atto 3 is roofed for six years, however with the identical mileage cap.

The battery guarantee, in the meantime, is eight years throughout the board, however the MG takes the lead relating to the mileage cap – 180,000 km versus 160,000 km for Chery and BYD. The latter additionally has a shorter eight-year/150,000 km guarantee for the drive unit, inclusive of the motor.

One massive draw for the Omoda E5 is that Chery gives a one-to-one substitute for the battery if its state of well being drops under 70% whereas the automotive remains to be beneath guarantee, no questions requested. It must be famous, nevertheless, that the BYD additionally has such a provision for a substitute battery (additionally with a state of well being threshold of 70%) in its proprietor’s handbook.

As for upkeep prices, not one of the firms present any service schedules or costs, though Chery does suggest a brake fluid service each 24 months or 40,000 km for the petrol-powered Omoda 5. Nonetheless, BYD does provide numerous service packages to maintain you in its after-sales community all through the length of your possession.

These embrace a Commonplace package deal that consists of the single-speed transmission oil servicing, air-con filter replacements and refrigerant servicing, brake fluid servicing and motor coolant servicing. That is priced at RM1,688 for 3 years, RM3,888 for six years and RM4,888 for eight years.

Alternatively, you should purchase a Plus package deal that throws in replacements for wipers, washer fluid, distant management and 12V batteries, and brake pads and discs. That is fairly pricey, weighing in RM7,888 for six years and RM12,888 for eight years.

What else?

Clockwise from left: Chery Omoda E5, MG ZS EV, BYD Atto 3

As you may think about, all automobiles on this listing present loads of equipment on your cash. You get LED headlights, keyless entry, computerized air-con (single-zone for the MG, dual-zone for the remainder), a powered driver’s seat, fake leather-based upholstery, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, a Qi wi-fi charger, a 360-degree digital camera system, six airbags and a full complement of driver assists that embrace adaptive cruise management and lane centring help.

Being a B-segment automotive, the ZS EV does lose out on a number of options, equivalent to a powered passenger seat and a powered tailgate; it additionally solely has 4 audio system, which appears a bit imply when the Omoda E5 has eight Sony-branded ones. On the flip aspect, it and the Atto 3 have a panoramic glass roof with a powered sunshade, whereas the Omoda E5 has an everyday sunroof with a handbook shade.

When it comes to infotainment, the BYD takes the cake with its novel 12.8-inch rotating touchscreen, though the Chery’s fastened 12.3-inch show is hardly any smaller and the MG’s 10.1-inch show remains to be of a good measurement. Higher but, the Chery and MG’s 12.3-inch digital instrument shows dwarf the BYD’s tiny five-inch readout.

Need to understand how these automobiles drive? We’ve got but to pattern the MG ZS EV, however you may try Hafriz’s evaluations of the Chery Omoda E5 and BYD Atto 3.

GALLERY: Chery Omoda E5 in Malaysia

GALLERY: MG ZS EV in Malaysia

GALLERY: BYD Atto 3 Prolonged Vary in Malaysia

Seeking to promote your automotive? Promote it with Carro.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here